Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Phlebology ; 27 Suppl 1: 40-5, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22312066

RESUMO

Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequencey ablation have become the procedures of choice for the treatment of superficial venous insufficiency. Their minimally invasive technique and safety profile when compared with operative saphenectomy have led to this change. As EVLA has replaced saphenectomy as the procedure of choice, the distribution of complications has changed. We evaluated the most common and most devastating complications in the literature including burns, nerve injury, arterio-venous fistula (AVF), endothermal heat-induced thrombosis and deep venous thrombosis. The following review will discuss the most frequently encountered complications of treatment of superficial venous insufficiency using EVLA. The majority of the complications described can be avoided with the use of good surgical technique and appropriate duplex ultrasound guidance. Overall, EVLA has an excellent safety profile and should be considered among the first line for treatment of superficial venous reflux.


Assuntos
Angioplastia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia a Laser/métodos , Insuficiência Venosa/terapia , Fístula Arteriovenosa/etiologia , Queimaduras/etiologia , Humanos , Trombose Venosa/etiologia
2.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 44(7): 572-5, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20675338

RESUMO

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains a viable option for treating carotid artery lesions in high surgical risk patients. We retrospectively reviewed our experience in performing CAS in patients with complex aortic arch anatomy. The ''coronary technique'' uses an AL1 guiding catheter to engage the origin of the common carotid artery permitting delivery of protection device and stent. In total, 12 patients had complex arch anatomy which precluded access using the standard technique as determined on preoperative imaging. A total of 8 patients with such anatomy underwent femoral artery catheterization with placement of an Amplatz AL1 guide catheter into the common carotid artery. All were able to be successfully treated, with no dissection, neurovascular deficit, or other major complication. Based on this case series, we describe the coronary technique as a safe and viable method for CAS in the setting of complex anatomy which might otherwise preclude CAS.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão/instrumentação , Angioplastia com Balão/métodos , Aorta Torácica/patologia , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/terapia , Artéria Carótida Primitiva , Stents , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aortografia/métodos , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Carótida Primitiva/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 51(1): 43-52, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20081761

RESUMO

Endovascular repair is becoming the mainstay of treatment for aneurysmal disease of the abdominal and thoracic aorta. Access related issues comprise a major reason for failure or conversion to open repair and can contribute to a significant amount of morbidity and mortality. This article will discuss a multitude of access related complications and their treatment. Preoperative imaging is paramount to the success of endovascular procedures. Intraoperative adjuncts, such as iliac artery angioplasty/stenting, the "pull-down" technique, and aorto mono iliac/femoral systems will be discussed. Occasionally, challenging iliac or femoral anatomy may preclude access through these vessels and the endovascular specialist may need to gain direct access through the aorta or via the carotid artery. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of an entirely percutaneous technique will be discussed. Finally, peri-operative complications such as rupture, dissection, pseudoaneurysm and infection will be discussed and various treatment modalities reviewed. As stent graft technology and our own skill sets and experience continue to improve, fewer patients will be refused an endovascular repair based on access issues alone.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/patologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/patologia , Prótese Vascular , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Humanos , Desenho de Prótese , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 24(1): 44-7, 2010 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19734007

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inadvertent subclavian artery catheterization during attempted central venous access is a well-known complication. Historically, these patients are managed with an open operative approach and repair under direct vision via an infraclavicular and/or supraclavicular incision. We describe our experience and technique for endovascular management of these injuries. METHODS: Twenty patients were identified with inadvertent iatrogenic subclavian artery cannulation. All cases were managed via an endovascular technique under local anesthesia. After correcting any coagulopathy, a 4-French glide catheter was percutaneously inserted into the ipsilateral brachial artery and placed in the proximal subclavian artery. Following an arteriogram and localization of the subclavian arterial insertion site, the subclavian catheter was removed and bimanual compression was performed on both sides of the clavicle around the puncture site for 20 min. A second angiogram was performed, and if there was any extravasation, pressure was held for an additional 20 min. If hemostasis was still not obtained, a stent graft was placed via the brachial access site to repair the arterial defect and control the bleeding. RESULTS: Two of the 20 patients required a stent graft for continued bleeding after compression. Both patients were well excluded after endovascular graft placement. Hemostasis was successfully obtained with bimanual compression over the puncture site in the remaining 18 patients. There were no resultant complications at either the subclavian or the brachial puncture site. CONCLUSION: This minimally invasive endovascular approach to iatrogenic subclavian artery injury is a safe alternative to blind removal with manual compression or direct open repair.


Assuntos
Implante de Prótese Vascular , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/terapia , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Doença Iatrogênica , Artéria Subclávia/lesões , Ferimentos Penetrantes/terapia , Prótese Vascular , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Hemorragia/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia/etiologia , Técnicas Hemostáticas/instrumentação , Humanos , Pressão , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents , Artéria Subclávia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos Penetrantes/etiologia
7.
N Engl J Med ; 287(24): 1236-8, 1972 Dec 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5084988
8.
J Dent Child ; 33(5): 284-7, 1966 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4224086
9.
West Med Med J West ; 7(4): 80-3, 1966 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5952275

Assuntos
Vinho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...